Twilio vs MessageBird: WhatsApp and SMS Pricing, Inbound Fees and Which Is Cheaper
On a delivered US WhatsApp utility message the two cost exactly the same, $0.0084 with Meta's fee included. The bill splits on what comes back: Twilio charges $0.005 for every message a customer sends you, and Bird, the company formerly called MessageBird, charges nothing for inbound.
Every figure on this page is quoted from Twilio's and Bird's own pricing pages and billing documentation.
Monthly WhatsApp bill, Twilio vs Bird
US, from Oct 1Replies are priced at $0.0084 on both, the service rate Bird publishes from October 1, 2026 and Twilio's $0.005 plus the same Meta share. Meta has not yet published its final US service rate, and because it is identical behind both providers it does not change the gap.
Twilio and MessageBird, which now trades as Bird, charge the same $0.0084 for a delivered US WhatsApp utility or authentication template. Twilio gets there as $0.005 of its own fee plus Meta's $0.0034. Bird quotes one number with Meta's share folded in. For one-way notifications, the price is a tie.
The gap opens on two-way traffic and on SMS. Twilio charges $0.005 for every inbound WhatsApp message, and Bird states inbound is free, so 10,000 customer messages a month cost $50 on Twilio and nothing on Bird. On US SMS, Bird's list price is $0.0035 per long code message against Twilio's $0.0083. Twilio's case rests on ecosystem and tooling, not on price.
Twilio vs Bird at a glance
Each row records what the vendor states on its own pricing page or billing documentation. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says so.
| What a buyer needs | Twilio | Bird (formerly MessageBird) |
|---|---|---|
| How WhatsApp is priced | $0.005 per message plus Meta's fee, shown as two lines | One all-in price per delivered message, Meta's fee included |
| US utility or authentication, delivered | $0.0084 | $0.0084 |
| Inbound WhatsApp message | $0.005 | Free, per Bird's documentation |
| Failed message | $0.001 processing fee on messages ending in Failed | Bird's send fee lands at processing, before dispatch; no separate failed fee published |
| Monthly platform or seat fee | None | None, "no platform fees, no per-seat tax" |
| How you pay Meta | Meta's fee passed through on your Twilio bill | Bird's credit line covers the WhatsApp accounts it onboards; you fund one Bird wallet |
| When the balance runs out | Account balance and auto-recharge on pay as you go | Send is rejected with insufficient_balance and nothing is charged |
| US SMS, long code, base | $0.0083 per segment | $0.0035 |
| Where it wins | Ecosystem, SDKs, documentation, adjacent products (Verify, Flex, SendGrid, Segment) | Two-way conversations, US SMS list price, one number to budget against |
Twilio vs MessageBird pricing for US WhatsApp, line by line
Twilio publishes its own fee and Meta's pass-through separately. Bird publishes the total. To compare them fairly you add Twilio's two columns and read Bird's one.
| Message, US recipient | Twilio fee | Meta fee | Twilio all in | Bird all in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utility template, outside the window | $0.005 | $0.0034 | $0.0084 | $0.0084 |
| Authentication template | $0.005 | $0.0034 | $0.0084 | $0.0084 |
| Service reply in the 24 hour window, from Oct 1, 2026 | $0.005 | Meta rate pending | $0.005 plus Meta | $0.0084 |
| Inbound message from a customer | $0.005 | $0 | $0.005 | $0 |
| Marketing template | Not deliverable: Twilio states Meta does not allow it in this region | n/a | $0.030 listed | |
The service reply row is the one to watch
From October 1, 2026, Meta starts charging for ordinary replies inside the customer service window, at the same per-market rate as utility and with no volume tiers. Meta said it would publish those rates by September 1 and still has not. Bird already lists $0.0084 for a US service message, which implies a Meta share of $0.0034. Whatever Meta finally publishes, it is billed identically behind both providers, so the Twilio vs Bird gap on replies stays at zero. The full timeline sits on our WhatsApp service messages page.
The $0.030 marketing row is not a real option
Meta paused delivery of marketing templates to US phone numbers on April 1, 2025. Twilio's US row says so outright. Bird's US table still prints a marketing price, which is easy to misread as a product you can buy. It is not: that message will not reach an American handset through Bird, Twilio or anyone else, because the rule is Meta's. Plan US programs on utility and authentication, and see which categories still deliver in our WhatsApp marketing messages guide.
Which is cheaper at your traffic mix
Volume barely matters here, because neither vendor has a monthly floor. What matters is the share of your traffic that customers start. Three typical US programs, priced from October 1, 2026:
| Program | Monthly mix | Twilio | Bird | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order and shipping alerts | 50,000 utility sent, 500 inbound, no replies | $422.50 | $420.00 | $2.50 |
| Appointment reminders with confirmations | 10,000 utility sent, 3,000 inbound, 3,000 replies | $124.20 | $109.20 | $15.00 |
| Customer support desk | 2,000 utility sent, 20,000 inbound, 20,000 replies | $284.80 | $184.80 | $100.00 |
The rule falls straight out of the rate cards: the difference is always the number of inbound messages times $0.005. A notification program barely notices it. A support desk where every ticket is a back and forth pays Twilio roughly half as much again. If you are still working out what a program costs end to end, including a provider with a monthly fee, our WhatsApp pricing calculator keeps Meta's fee and the provider's fee on separate lines.
Twilio vs MessageBird SMS pricing in the US
Many teams compare the two for SMS first and WhatsApp second. Here the list prices are not close.
| US SMS, outbound | Twilio base | Bird base |
|---|---|---|
| Long code (10DLC) | $0.0083 | $0.0035 |
| Toll-free | $0.0083 | $0.0035 |
| Short code | $0.0083 | $0.0070 |
| Carrier fee, long code (AT&T / T-Mobile / Verizon) | $0.0035 / $0.0045 / $0.0045 | $0.0035 / $0.0045 / $0.0045 |
| Failed message | $0.001 | Not published |
Carrier fees are set by the carriers and pass through at the same amounts on both, so the base rate is the only real difference. At 10,000 long code texts a month that is $83 on Twilio against $35 on Bird before carrier fees. Twilio advertises committed-use discounts for larger senders without publishing them, so a big SMS buyer should get a Twilio quote before assuming the gap holds. Both require 10DLC brand and campaign registration for long code traffic to US numbers, which we cover on our 10DLC and WhatsApp page. Note the old comparison sites quoting Bird "from $0.00331" are citing an earlier rate card.
Who should pick which
Pick Twilio when
- Your traffic is mostly one way, alerts and codes, where the per-message price is identical anyway.
- You already run Twilio Verify, Flex, SendGrid or Segment and want one vendor, one console and one invoice.
- Your engineers value the depth of Twilio's SDKs, sample code and community answers over a lower SMS rate.
- You want a small, published fee on failed sends rather than a send fee that lands before dispatch.
Pick Bird when
- Customers write back a lot, because Bird does not charge for inbound and Twilio charges $0.005 each time.
- You also send US SMS in volume and Bird's $0.0035 list price beats Twilio's $0.0083 by more than half.
- Finance wants a single all-in number per message and a prepaid wallet that rejects sends rather than overdrawing.
- You need authentication codes on WhatsApp before your own number is approved; Bird offers shared senders for that, outside authentication-international markets.
And the third option people add to this shortlist
Vonage prices WhatsApp the Twilio way, a platform fee plus Meta's share, but its fee for North American utility, authentication and service messages is $0.00219, well under Twilio's $0.005. We worked through the three together in Twilio vs Vonage WhatsApp pricing. For a wider cut across every provider whose dollar rates we could verify, see the cheapest WhatsApp API provider comparison.
Both are APIs. Neither is a campaign tool.
Twilio and Bird sell message transport. Pick either and you get endpoints, webhooks and a bill, but no screen where someone on your team uploads a contact list, picks an approved template, schedules the send and reads who got it. Somebody has to build that, and in most comparisons it is the cost nobody wrote down.
If the real job is sending template campaigns to customer lists you already own, WaBulkSend runs on the same Meta rates and gives you the lists, templates, scheduling and delivery reports without the build. Plans are $29, $99 and $299 a month, or half that billed yearly, and Meta's per-message fee stays a separate, visible line so you can check it against the tables above. For how that compares with a pure API bill, our WhatsApp bulk messaging platform page lays out the trade.
If you are on Bird already and weighing a move, our MessageBird WhatsApp alternative page covers what changes. Coming from Twilio, the Twilio WhatsApp alternative page does the same.
Questions buyers ask about Twilio and MessageBird
Is MessageBird cheaper than Twilio?
For outbound US WhatsApp templates, no: both charge $0.0084 per delivered utility or authentication message with Meta's fee included. Bird becomes cheaper when customers write back, because Twilio charges $0.005 per inbound message and Bird states inbound messages are free. On US SMS, Bird's list price of $0.0035 per long code message is well under Twilio's $0.0083.
Is MessageBird the same as Bird?
Yes. MessageBird renamed itself Bird in 2024 and now operates at bird.com. The WhatsApp, SMS and email APIs are the same company, and older MessageBird API documentation and account references point at the Bird platform. When you compare Twilio vs MessageBird today, you are comparing Twilio with Bird.
How much does Twilio charge per WhatsApp message?
Twilio charges $0.005 per WhatsApp message, inbound or outbound, plus Meta's per-template fee which it passes through. A delivered US utility or authentication template costs $0.0084 all in. Twilio also charges a $0.001 processing fee on messages that end in a Failed status, and there is no monthly platform fee. Every US row is on our Twilio WhatsApp pricing page.
How much does Bird charge per WhatsApp message in the US?
Bird publishes one all-in price per delivered message for US recipients: $0.0084 for utility, $0.0084 for authentication, and $0.0084 for service messages from October 1, 2026, with Meta's fee already included. It also lists $0.030 for marketing, a category Meta has not delivered to US numbers since April 1, 2025. The detail is in our MessageBird pricing breakdown.
Does Twilio charge for incoming WhatsApp messages?
Yes. Twilio's pricing page states its per-message fee for WhatsApp is $0.005 inbound or outbound, so every message a customer sends you costs $0.005. Meta adds nothing on inbound. Bird's documentation states inbound messages stay free, which is the single biggest pricing difference between the two for support or two-way traffic.
Which is better for WhatsApp, Twilio or MessageBird?
Twilio is the stronger pick for engineering teams that want the widest ecosystem, mature SDKs and a small published fee on failed messages. Bird is the cheaper pick for two-way conversations and for US SMS, and it bundles Meta's fee into one number. For one-way US notifications the per-message cost is identical, so tooling decides it.
Does Twilio or Bird have a monthly fee for WhatsApp?
Neither charges a monthly platform fee for WhatsApp messaging. Twilio bills per message with no platform or seat fee. Bird's pricing page states no platform fees and no per-seat charges, and every channel bills per use at its published rate. You pay for phone numbers and messages, not for access.
Can you send WhatsApp marketing messages to US numbers on Twilio or Bird?
Not today, on either. Meta paused delivery of marketing templates to US phone numbers on April 1, 2025. Twilio's US marketing row states Meta does not allow the template in that region, while Bird's US table still lists a $0.030 marketing price. That is a price for a message that will not arrive, so plan US traffic on utility and authentication.
Is Bird SMS cheaper than Twilio SMS in the US?
On list price, yes. Bird publishes $0.0035 per US long code or toll-free SMS and $0.0070 per short code message. Twilio publishes $0.0083 per segment across long code, toll-free and short code. Both pass carrier fees through on top, for example $0.0035 for AT&T and $0.0045 for T-Mobile and Verizon on long code.
Can I move my WhatsApp number from Twilio to Bird?
Yes. A WhatsApp Business Account number can be migrated between providers, and it keeps its display name and quality rating. Approved message templates generally do not carry over and must be recreated and approved again on the new provider, so the size of your template library is the real switching cost. The sequence is in our guide to switching WhatsApp Business API providers.
Skip the build and send your first campaign
Contact lists, approved templates, scheduling and delivery reports on the same Meta rates as Twilio and Bird. Plans start at $29 a month, or $14.50 a month billed yearly.
Keep comparing providers
Twilio WhatsApp pricing
Every US row, the $0.005 fee in both directions and what lands on the invoice.
MessageBird pricing
Bird's all-in US rate per message and how its two-step billing works.
Infobip vs Twilio
A published rate against an enterprise contract with a monthly minimum.
Cheapest WhatsApp API provider
Why the cheapest provider flips at a volume instead of being a fixed ranking.
respond.io pricing
Monthly against yearly plan prices and the contact tiers on top.
WhatsApp Business API pricing
How Meta's fee and the provider's fee stack into one bill.